We use cookies to personalize content and to analyze our traffic. Please decide if you are willing to accept cookies from our website.

The Education Futures Blog


We find ourselves in an era where the languages of technology—bytes, pixels, and algorithms—have become as fundamental as the ABCs we learned in school. But are our educational systems keeping up? What happens when we stitch the narrative of disruptive technology into the fabric of education? Recently, a study by María Cristina Martínez-Bravo and John Moravec was published: "Global trends in disruptive technological change: social and policy implications for education. The article delves into the heart of this paradigm shift, and it’s something every educator, policymaker, and lifelong learner should take note of.

The study’s aim & method

Deploying a wo-stage meta-analysis on 1,155 scholarly articles, the study seeks to unearth the ripple effects of disruptive technologies across the educational landscape. The study reveals a few ah-ha moments:

  • A compelling interplay exists between emerging educational trends and disruptive technologies.
  • Four pivotal focal points—nexus points, if you will—delineate how these technologies are radically reshaping educational paradigms.
  • The study shines a spotlight on societal vulnerabilities in areas like ethics, sustainability, resilience, security, and policy.

Implications for those of us on the ground

Simply put, the traditional frameworks of education and the needs of our digital society are on divergent paths. Our educational bastions, often resistant to change, are missing out on the boon—or perhaps, the imperative—of integrating disruptive technologies.

What takes this study from insightful to indispensable is its application. It offers four curated resource collections, together with mini-case studies, and four scenarios to help guide policymakers and leaders. It’s not just a “read and forget” academic paper; it’s a playbook for helping you create your own education futures.

If you’re intrigued—and you should be—take a deep dive into the full article: